As my tenure on the Drupal Association was concluding, I was asked to give the Keynote for …
Perhaps you’ll recognize these words, “About five years ago I started to notice an odd thing. The products that the database vendors were building had less and less to do with what the customers wanted. … So, what is this growing disconnect?” Those words were written in 2004 by Adam Bosworth, a veteren of Microsoft, Google and BEA. In the 7 years since things have only gotten worse. Open source products came to maturity (if you can call it that), but none improved on any of the challenges Bosworth outlines. He points out 3 things that everyone wants in a database, but nobody is providing.. well nobody except MongoDB.
1. Dynamic Schema
Dynamic schema so that as the business model/description of goods or services changes and evolves, this evolution can be handled seamlessly in a system running 24 by 7, 365 days a year. This means that Amazon can track new things about new goods without changing the running system. It means that Federal Express can add Federal Express Ground seamlessly to their running tracking system and so on. In short, the database should handle unlimited change.
Mongo with it’s document design handles this elegantly and gracefully. We’ve made loads of changes to our database without even needing to worry about migrations. The responsibility to maintain changes falls on the application and isn’t a constrained by the database.
2. Dynamic Partitioning
Dynamic partitioning of data across large dynamic numbers of machines. … The only issue is that it needs to be dynamic so that as items are added or get “busy” the system dynamically load balances their data across the machines. In short, the database should handle unlimited scale with very low latency. It can do this because the vast majority of queries will be local to a product or a customer or something over which you can partion.
Mongo has solved this as well with it’s automatic sharding. It runs pretty much exactly as he requests. Mongo automatically distributes data among shards and balances them dynamically.
3. Modern Indexing
Google has spoiled the world. Everyone has learned that just typing in a few words should show the relevant results in a couple of hundred milliseconds.
He is a bit vague on what he means here, so taken one way, everyone has solved this, but then again if taken that way, it was solved long before 2004 when this was written. I’m going to take it to mean real indexing across highly distributed data stores. So you can find a set of data across many nodes all extremely quickly. I’d like to add this to automatic indexing. There is no reason not to do this using a similar approach to how mongo tackled sharding. Again as he ins’t clear on what he is asking for it’s not clear if MongoDB has solved it or not. I think with their map reduce framework and the ability to create combined indexes on rich structured documents I think they are heading in the right direction, but I don’t think they’ve quite solved this yet.